Is Radiation The Best Option?
Electron micrograph of a single breast cancer cell.
The most controversial issue in health-care today. We are determined to provide you with the most scientific research there is regarding cancer treatment effectiveness & safety. While we are not qualified to diagnose or treat cancer we will bring you the latest research regarding cancer treatments so you can make the decision that is right for you. What you are about to read can alter the course of your life from here forward. We recommend you share this page with as many people as you can. Much of the research here is done by Oncologists, Physicians and Scientists.
Cancer is considered a death sentence by many. Yet how much do we really know about cancer? What lies below will detail the therapies used today and why we feel they need to cease the treatments and begin practicing other modalities that are proven far more effective & safe!
If the concerns outweigh the benefits than we ought to rethink our position.
Cancer is considered a death sentence by many. Yet how much do we really know about cancer? What lies below will detail the therapies used today and why we feel they need to cease the treatments and begin practicing other modalities that are proven far more effective & safe!
If the concerns outweigh the benefits than we ought to rethink our position.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
DISCLAIMER: This page will be updated regularly as we are always researching. If you have research you wish us to put here fill-in the form on the left. Even though we primarily have data concerning the side effects of these therapies it does not mean we oppose data that supports radiation. We want to inform everyone at large of questions and observations that are of a significant concern regarding cancer protocols, therapies and reasons for use. We must review the data.
“The right thing to do never requires any subterfuge, it is always simple and direct.” Calvin Coolidge |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We don't disagree that radiation kills cancer. What we want others to be aware of is it often kills you too.
This practice of radiotherapy to kill cancer should be called malpractice!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We don't disagree that radiation kills cancer. What we want others to be aware of is it often kills you too.
This practice of radiotherapy to kill cancer should be called malpractice!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Under-Construction
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Must-Read Articles:
The cure for wasted cancer fund donations
Radiation gone wrong
Are Americans Overexposed to Radiation From Imaging Tests?
Nearly 30,000 Americans Get Cancer From This One Procedure EVERY Year: Will You?
The FDA assaults breast thermography while protecting mammography industry
Do cell phones cause cancer?
Magnesium Offers Strong Radiation Protection
The cure for wasted cancer fund donations
Radiation gone wrong
Are Americans Overexposed to Radiation From Imaging Tests?
Nearly 30,000 Americans Get Cancer From This One Procedure EVERY Year: Will You?
The FDA assaults breast thermography while protecting mammography industry
Do cell phones cause cancer?
Magnesium Offers Strong Radiation Protection
Must-See Videos:
- Dr Burzynski movie (FULL VERSION)
- Sodium Bicarbonate and Cancer Treatment - Mark Sircus, Ac., OMD
- Cancer Cured in Canada But Big Pharma Says 'NO WAY'!
- * CANCER CURE BANNED by Government to enrich drug companies!
- CANCER - The Forbidden Cures - TRAILER
- Suzanne Somers Throws Knockout for Cancer
- #2 Burzynski, The Movie - Trailer No. 2 - CANCER - DVD now available
- Burzynski Clinic, Houston's Premier Cancer Treatment Center
Is Radiation safe?
Radiotherapy: This page is under construction
Concern
Concern
- Radiation-induced sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast carcinoma: a large-scale single-institution review.
- Functional promoter rs2868371 variant of HSPB1 associates with radiation-induced esophageal toxicity in patients with non-small-cell . . .
- Surgical management of radiation-induced temporal lobe necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Report of 14 cases.
- Management of cancer therapy-induced oral mucositis.
- Predictive factors of radiation-induced skin toxicity in breast cancer patients.
- 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897-1997.
- The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks.
- Increased risk of stroke in young head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
- Screening Hodgkin lymphoma survivors for radiotherapy induced cardiovascular disease.
- Radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV): MASCC/ESMO guideline for antiemetics in radiotherapy: update 2009.
- Pro-inflammatory cytokines play a key role in the development of radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis.
- Total vaginal necrosis: a representative example of underreporting severe late toxic reaction after concomitant chemoradiation for cervical cancer.
- Radiotherapy-induced mitral stenosis: a three-dimensional perspective.
- Spontaneous and radiation-induced chromosomal instability and persistence of chromosome aberrations after radiotherapy in lymphocytes . . .
- Changes in glucose metabolism during and after radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
- A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part II: second cancer risk estimation.
- Radiotherapy-induced decreases in substance P levels may potentiate melanoma growth.
- Renal tumours: long-term outcome.
- Investigating the embryo/larval toxic and genotoxic effects of γ irradiation on zebrafish eggs.
- [DNA damage in lymphocytes after irradiation with 211At and 188Re].
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Words From Doctors
"More people live off cancer than die from it."
Dr. Deepak Chopra, M.D.
"What she (Dr. Johanna Budwig) has demonstrated to my initial disbelief but lately, to my complete satisfaction in my practice is: CANCER IS EASILY CURABLE, the treatment is dietary/lifestyle, the response is immediate; the cancer cell is weak and vulnerable; the precise biochemical breakdown point was identified by her in 1951 and is specifically correctable, in vitro (test-tube) as well as in vivo (real)... "
Dr. Dan C. Roehm M.D. FACP (Oncologists and former cardiologist) in 1990
"The FDA, NCI and ACS, and the large treatment centres work to eliminate choice of cancer therapies, particulary better ones. They openly attack breakthroughs made by "mavericks", which they define as anyone outside their ranks. Folks, any serious study of how these entities work together to destroy hopeful approaches to cancer reveals a trail of corruption, conspiracy, dishonesty, and inhumanity that warrants desigantion of evil……..We continue to use them not because they work, but because those who perform them have so vigorously eliminated any other choice.
First, I would not even check in with a conventional oncologist, particulary not one from a prominent cancer institution. Their expertise is in implementing the erroneous paradigm that cancer must be purged from the body with toxic methods. This is, in my opinion, no more valuable than maps from the Flat Earth Society. When there is a paradigm shift---and we definitely are in the middle of one with cancer treatment---those sitting on the lofty perches of authority are the last to make the change, because they are guarding the paradigm about to be replaced. I don’t buy maps of a flat earth, and I wouldn’t go to the NCI or Memorial Sloan-Kettering Centre for cancer treatment.
I’d turn my back on 50 years of institutionalised expertise, because it follows the wrong paradigm. Everything that is done in medicine today or in any other discipline fits some paradigm. The paradigm I use for cancer is that it is a systemic problem in which the normal control mechanisms of your body are altered. Your immune system likely bears the largest burden for this control; thus, all techniques that enhance it are promising. Those that damage it are not."
Dr. Julian Whitaker, M.D.
"As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."
Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President, American Chemical Society
"Two to 4% of cancers respond to chemotherapy……The bottom line is for a few kinds of cancer chemo is a life extending procedure---Hodgkin's disease, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Testicular cancer, and Choriocarcinoma."
Ralph Moss, Ph.D. 1995 Author of Questioning Chemotherapy
"We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison."
"Chemotherapy is an incredibly lucrative business for doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies…..The medical establishment wants everyone to follow the same exact protocol. They don’t want to see the chemotherapy industry go under, and that’s the number one obstacle to any progress in oncology."
Dr. Glen Warner, M.D. Oncologist
"The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day."
Dr. Ley former Commissioner of the FDA
"What made Dr Burzynski a threat to the cancer industry from the beginning was the prospect that antineoplaston therapy represented a successful alternative to toxic and dangerous chemotherapy drugs, upon which most of the cancer industry’s profits depend. Did the NCI pick up the tab for completing his research? Did the ACS help with favourable publicity? Of course not. The minute NCI saw evidence of antineoplastons working they distorted the data by withdrawing the 2 successful patients and thus the evidence. NCI’s conduct towards him is a striking example of how an agency presumed to be objective can set up a study that will either prove or disprove anything it wants. In this case, there is clear evidence that NCI wanted to prove antineoplastons didn’t work."
John Diamond, M.D. & Lee Cowden, M.D.
"Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors."
Allen Levin, MD UCSF The Healing of Cancer
"More people live off cancer than die from it."
Dr. Deepak Chopra, M.D.
"What she (Dr. Johanna Budwig) has demonstrated to my initial disbelief but lately, to my complete satisfaction in my practice is: CANCER IS EASILY CURABLE, the treatment is dietary/lifestyle, the response is immediate; the cancer cell is weak and vulnerable; the precise biochemical breakdown point was identified by her in 1951 and is specifically correctable, in vitro (test-tube) as well as in vivo (real)... "
Dr. Dan C. Roehm M.D. FACP (Oncologists and former cardiologist) in 1990
"The FDA, NCI and ACS, and the large treatment centres work to eliminate choice of cancer therapies, particulary better ones. They openly attack breakthroughs made by "mavericks", which they define as anyone outside their ranks. Folks, any serious study of how these entities work together to destroy hopeful approaches to cancer reveals a trail of corruption, conspiracy, dishonesty, and inhumanity that warrants desigantion of evil……..We continue to use them not because they work, but because those who perform them have so vigorously eliminated any other choice.
First, I would not even check in with a conventional oncologist, particulary not one from a prominent cancer institution. Their expertise is in implementing the erroneous paradigm that cancer must be purged from the body with toxic methods. This is, in my opinion, no more valuable than maps from the Flat Earth Society. When there is a paradigm shift---and we definitely are in the middle of one with cancer treatment---those sitting on the lofty perches of authority are the last to make the change, because they are guarding the paradigm about to be replaced. I don’t buy maps of a flat earth, and I wouldn’t go to the NCI or Memorial Sloan-Kettering Centre for cancer treatment.
I’d turn my back on 50 years of institutionalised expertise, because it follows the wrong paradigm. Everything that is done in medicine today or in any other discipline fits some paradigm. The paradigm I use for cancer is that it is a systemic problem in which the normal control mechanisms of your body are altered. Your immune system likely bears the largest burden for this control; thus, all techniques that enhance it are promising. Those that damage it are not."
Dr. Julian Whitaker, M.D.
"As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."
Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President, American Chemical Society
"Two to 4% of cancers respond to chemotherapy……The bottom line is for a few kinds of cancer chemo is a life extending procedure---Hodgkin's disease, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, Testicular cancer, and Choriocarcinoma."
Ralph Moss, Ph.D. 1995 Author of Questioning Chemotherapy
"We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison."
"Chemotherapy is an incredibly lucrative business for doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies…..The medical establishment wants everyone to follow the same exact protocol. They don’t want to see the chemotherapy industry go under, and that’s the number one obstacle to any progress in oncology."
Dr. Glen Warner, M.D. Oncologist
"The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day."
Dr. Ley former Commissioner of the FDA
"What made Dr Burzynski a threat to the cancer industry from the beginning was the prospect that antineoplaston therapy represented a successful alternative to toxic and dangerous chemotherapy drugs, upon which most of the cancer industry’s profits depend. Did the NCI pick up the tab for completing his research? Did the ACS help with favourable publicity? Of course not. The minute NCI saw evidence of antineoplastons working they distorted the data by withdrawing the 2 successful patients and thus the evidence. NCI’s conduct towards him is a striking example of how an agency presumed to be objective can set up a study that will either prove or disprove anything it wants. In this case, there is clear evidence that NCI wanted to prove antineoplastons didn’t work."
John Diamond, M.D. & Lee Cowden, M.D.
"Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon, or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade, yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors."
Allen Levin, MD UCSF The Healing of Cancer
______________________________________________________________________
"Science is nothing, but trained and organized common sense."
Thomas H. Huxley
______________________________________________________________________
All contents except quotations © 2009-2015 Body Epiphanies Massage & Nutrition
"Science is nothing, but trained and organized common sense."
Thomas H. Huxley
______________________________________________________________________
All contents except quotations © 2009-2015 Body Epiphanies Massage & Nutrition